Wake Forest
Men
-
Women
2016
-
2017 -
2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
132 |
Samantha Halvorsen |
SO |
20:05 |
261 |
Hannah Brookover |
SO |
20:26 |
363 |
Meredith Smith |
JR |
20:38 |
427 |
Eliza Lukens-Day |
SR |
20:44 |
553 |
Catherine Allen |
SR |
20:56 |
829 |
Anna Campbell |
FR |
21:17 |
1,230 |
Kathryn Kenwood |
SO |
21:43 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.5% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
12.5% |
Top 10 in Regional |
90.1% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Samantha Halvorsen |
Hannah Brookover |
Meredith Smith |
Eliza Lukens-Day |
Catherine Allen |
Anna Campbell |
Kathryn Kenwood |
Paul Short Gold |
09/29 |
951 |
20:21 |
20:31 |
21:08 |
20:58 |
21:14 |
21:22 |
21:52 |
Pre-Nationals (Red) |
10/14 |
826 |
20:00 |
20:30 |
20:49 |
20:46 |
21:02 |
21:11 |
22:05 |
ACC Championship |
10/27 |
737 |
19:52 |
20:26 |
20:30 |
20:36 |
21:00 |
21:21 |
21:28 |
Southeast Region Championships |
11/10 |
666 |
19:55 |
20:15 |
20:21 |
20:38 |
20:43 |
21:15 |
21:36 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
5.8% |
27.6 |
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
Region Championship |
100% |
7.8 |
236 |
|
0.3 |
1.7 |
3.7 |
6.8 |
11.9 |
20.4 |
20.8 |
15.2 |
9.4 |
5.0 |
3.3 |
1.2 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Samantha Halvorsen |
12.6% |
90.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Hannah Brookover |
6.1% |
156.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meredith Smith |
5.8% |
185.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliza Lukens-Day |
5.8% |
197.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catherine Allen |
5.8% |
214.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anna Campbell |
5.8% |
237.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathryn Kenwood |
5.9% |
247.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Samantha Halvorsen |
20.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
3.1 |
3.6 |
4.5 |
5.3 |
4.9 |
5.6 |
5.0 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
4.9 |
4.6 |
4.1 |
4.9 |
4.3 |
Hannah Brookover |
35.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
Meredith Smith |
49.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
Eliza Lukens-Day |
55.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
Catherine Allen |
68.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Anna Campbell |
96.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathryn Kenwood |
135.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.3% |
100.0% |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
2 |
3 |
1.7% |
32.4% |
| |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
0.6 |
3 |
4 |
3.7% |
24.3% |
| |
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
2.8 |
|
0.9 |
4 |
5 |
6.8% |
14.7% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
5.8 |
|
1.0 |
5 |
6 |
11.9% |
10.5% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
10.7 |
|
1.3 |
6 |
7 |
20.4% |
4.4% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
19.5 |
|
0.9 |
7 |
8 |
20.8% |
3.1% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
0.3 |
20.1 |
|
0.7 |
8 |
9 |
15.2% |
1.7% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
14.9 |
|
0.3 |
9 |
10 |
9.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
5.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
3.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
1.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
Total |
100% |
5.8% |
|
0.3 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
94.2 |
0.3 |
5.5 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.